V8 engine No. not on the list

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
scutter
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:53 pm

V8 engine No. not on the list

Post by scutter »

Greetings gentlemen,

We're trying to identify a v8 engine that was purchased this week,
The number isn't listed in the current list in the stickys at the beginning of this section.

From the stampings we've got a Comp ratio of 8.13 and an engine number of 34127079F, Anyone able to shed some light on this matter, i.e. where or what it came from.

A spanner in the works if the latter addition of a flapper EFI system.

Many thanks in advance, Dan.


User avatar
Pocket rocket
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:08 am
Location: Hawkinge, Kent

Post by Pocket rocket »

Looks like a Range Rrover (1970-83) originally fitted with carbs. Have a look here....

http://www.v8scimitar.co.uk/technical/r ... umbers.htm
scutter
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:53 pm

Post by scutter »

Cheers, that's the same list we have on this site, the confusion lies between the 341***** No. and the compression ratio not matching.

I think we'll end up rebuilding and sticking some higher comp. pistons in anyway.

ATB Dan.
katanaman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by katanaman »

It probably is a RR engine but with a different suffix. The numbers that I have provided aren't complete but are the most common ones that I could find. It could be military spec for example. The idea is people are supposed to confirm what they have and get added but it rarely happens that way. Either way its no big deal as you have a good idea of the age range so any parts in that range will fit. By all means use higher comp pistons, if its a car then I would go for 9.75:1 pistons.
User avatar
Pocket rocket
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:08 am
Location: Hawkinge, Kent

Post by Pocket rocket »

scutter wrote:Cheers, that's the same list we have on this site, the confusion lies between the 341***** No. and the compression ratio not matching.

I think we'll end up rebuilding and sticking some higher comp. pistons in anyway.

ATB Dan.
Sorry dan - I knew I shouldn't have had them beers before I logged on :oops:
Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”