200mph advice
Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:18 pm
For the record I've been offered a 5.3 for 3.5k so I don't thinkit's that to hard.
but it's answering my main query whether to stick to the rover. I can get a LS 1 plus 6speed tremec for similar money. Not sure on the iron block thou with weight wise although it could help stability at speed.
thanks again
James
but it's answering my main query whether to stick to the rover. I can get a LS 1 plus 6speed tremec for similar money. Not sure on the iron block thou with weight wise although it could help stability at speed.
thanks again
James
-
- Forum Contributor
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Trying to achieve 500+ on ANY Rover V8 ( with the exception of a Wildcat perhaps ) is a lost cause.
And on the versions which could do it, it would cost an absolute fortune.
Buy a cheap LS variant, either in Aluminium or iron block ( 5.3 alloy, or 6.0 iron ) and you will have a cheap, strong platform capable of making power that a RV8 would only dream of, at any cost.
Although that link earlier of the 5.3 with an MP70 turbocharger. I dont think is possible that combo would ever make 900. The turbo is too small. More like 7-750 at most. And the cars track times reflect about 6-650bhp IMO from the videos I could find on Youtube..
And on the versions which could do it, it would cost an absolute fortune.
Buy a cheap LS variant, either in Aluminium or iron block ( 5.3 alloy, or 6.0 iron ) and you will have a cheap, strong platform capable of making power that a RV8 would only dream of, at any cost.
Although that link earlier of the 5.3 with an MP70 turbocharger. I dont think is possible that combo would ever make 900. The turbo is too small. More like 7-750 at most. And the cars track times reflect about 6-650bhp IMO from the videos I could find on Youtube..
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:18 pm
-
- Getting There
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:45 pm
I can find out exact numbers and the dyno type if you are interested.stevieturbo wrote: Although that link earlier of the 5.3 with an MP70 turbocharger. I dont think is possible that combo would ever make 900. The turbo is too small. More like 7-750 at most. And the cars track times reflect about 6-650bhp IMO from the videos I could find on Youtube..
-
- Forum Contributor
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Looking at the vids....its running very high 6's or low 7's at 98-104 or so over the 1/8th.
I know other LS automatic cars with about 800+ would be doing that in low 6's at 110-115mph.
Although the vids are maybe a different spec etc.
But using the 5.3 would be the cheapest starting point for a budget stormer. They are very cheap compared to the alloy 5.7 or 6.0 engines.
I know other LS automatic cars with about 800+ would be doing that in low 6's at 110-115mph.
Although the vids are maybe a different spec etc.
But using the 5.3 would be the cheapest starting point for a budget stormer. They are very cheap compared to the alloy 5.7 or 6.0 engines.
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:18 pm
-
- Getting There
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:45 pm
James: The youtube link that I posted first off shows the build and initial dyno tune.
Stevie: I know the numbers were being kept secret cos of some competition, but I think are now available. The flywheel figure I was told was just shy of 900. Now of course that could be 25% ontop of the wheel figure from a dynojet, which would probably put it in the 700 area in real life, but worth me checking.
Certainly a good junkyard type build whatever they are getting
Stevie: I know the numbers were being kept secret cos of some competition, but I think are now available. The flywheel figure I was told was just shy of 900. Now of course that could be 25% ontop of the wheel figure from a dynojet, which would probably put it in the 700 area in real life, but worth me checking.
Certainly a good junkyard type build whatever they are getting

-
- Newbie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:18 pm
If you find a 6.0 or a 5.3 LS* and get the manual box with it it will be a T5/6..... save alot of hassel when it comes to trying how to gear it for 200+ mph That extra gear will save alot of potential expense when it comes to getting the thing to pull away in first and pull to top 200, the power band can be 500 - 600 revs narrower with the extra gear which would equate to alot of saved money when it comes to tuning the thing. Thinking about it a 700 -750 bhp 5.3l based around a single big turbo would do it with the 6 speed and you should be able to build it on your budget if you do alot of it yourself, but it will be tight.
Mike
Mike
poppet valves rule!