Stage 1 or 2 heads for 3.5 V8

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
User avatar
martin_t
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Notts/Lincs border
Contact:

Stage 1 or 2 heads for 3.5 V8

Post by martin_t »

Hi
Can you tell me with a few questions regarding upgrading my RV8. I currently have a standard bored 3.5 SD1 with a Hurricane cam, duplex timing chain, standard heads and a a weber 500 carb. My question is, can I put on stage 1 or 2 heads without any other mods and if so will I get a noticeable performance increase (BHP)? I had thought of getting a pair of old heads and trying to port them myself, with a bit of help to get the valve seats done etc.
Any comments and advice would be greatly appreciated.

Martin


stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by stevieturbo »

Heads are almost always worth it IMO.

As to what spec....depends on your budget. But I say always buy the best you can afford. that way you wont regret doing it later, and want to buy better.
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
User avatar
Stephen Leckie
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:31 pm
Location: Central Scotland

Post by Stephen Leckie »

Depends on budget. Cheapest - file exhaust ports to match the manifold. Or send the heads to Roland Marlow at ACR Automotive for a proper doing. he did mine - there is not much he doesn't know about V8's.
My 4.8 v8 pulls 300 hp at 6150 rpm. Same torque at 4000.
katanaman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by katanaman »

Stephen Leckie wrote:Depends on budget. Cheapest - file exhaust ports to match the manifold. Or send the heads to Roland Marlow at ACR Automotive for a proper doing. he did mine - there is not much he doesn't know about V8's.
My 4.8 v8 pulls 300 hp at 6150 rpm. Same torque at 4000.
No don't file the exhaust ports to match the manifold. You need a step to catch the reflected wave coming back up the exhaust. Unless of course your doing an all out high rev for a track.
sidecar
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2399
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:52 pm

Post by sidecar »

katanaman wrote:
Stephen Leckie wrote:Depends on budget. Cheapest - file exhaust ports to match the manifold. Or send the heads to Roland Marlow at ACR Automotive for a proper doing. he did mine - there is not much he doesn't know about V8's.
My 4.8 v8 pulls 300 hp at 6150 rpm. Same torque at 4000.
No don't file the exhaust ports to match the manifold. You need a step to catch the reflected wave coming back up the exhaust. Unless of course your doing an all out high rev for a track.

You can also create the step by not matching the round header tube with the square exhaust port flange. (You can sort of flattern the tube so that the sides match but not the top and/or bottom).

:D

Pete
User avatar
HairbearTE
Guru
Guru
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Melton Mowbray

Post by HairbearTE »

That engine sounds like it's crying out for a decent pair of heads, having already had some sensible mods already. It would be fair to expect a gain of 25+hp over the standard 3.5 heads and you can add another 10 at least with some good headers.
Image
RoverP6B
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:08 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by RoverP6B »

By increasing the size of the inlet ports, ie stage 1 or stage 2 depending, you will increase the ability of the heads to breath better at higher revs, but of course there is a trade off, torque in the lower rev band will be reduced.

Torque equals acceleration, so until the revs rise sufficiently, acceleration will suffer.

Fuel consumption will also increase quite considerably.

These are my understanding of such modifications.

I recall seeing a graph of torque and horsepower between a 4.6 with standard heads, and the same engine with stage 3 heads.
Up to 3500rpm, the standard engine delivered more power and more torque, which for a road car is exactly what you need.

Beyond the 3500rpm point, the 4.6 with stage 3 heads pulled right away in both power and torque.
4.6 Rover 3500 P6B
User avatar
martin_t
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Notts/Lincs border
Contact:

Stage1\2 heads

Post by martin_t »

RoverP6B wrote:By increasing the size of the inlet ports, ie stage 1 or stage 2 depending, you will increase the ability of the heads to breath better at higher revs, but of course there is a trade off, torque in the lower rev band will be reduced.

Torque equals acceleration, so until the revs rise sufficiently, acceleration will suffer.

Fuel consumption will also increase quite considerably.

These are my understanding of such modifications.

I recall seeing a graph of torque and horsepower between a 4.6 with standard heads, and the same engine with stage 3 heads.
Up to 3500rpm, the standard engine delivered more power and more torque, which for a road car is exactly what you need.

Beyond the 3500rpm point, the 4.6 with stage 3 heads pulled right away in both power and torque.
I guess really what my question is, is that can these heads bolt straight on or will I need to make other mods to accomodate the uprated heads??

Thanks

Martin
kokkolanpoika
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by kokkolanpoika »

RoverP6B wrote:By increasing the size of the inlet ports, ie stage 1 or stage 2 depending, you will increase the ability of the heads to breath better at higher revs, but of course there is a trade off, torque in the lower rev band will be reduced.

Torque equals acceleration, so until the revs rise sufficiently, acceleration will suffer.

Fuel consumption will also increase quite considerably.

These are my understanding of such modifications.

I recall seeing a graph of torque and horsepower between a 4.6 with standard heads, and the same engine with stage 3 heads.
Up to 3500rpm, the standard engine delivered more power and more torque, which for a road car is exactly what you need.

Beyond the 3500rpm point, the 4.6 with stage 3 heads pulled right away in both power and torque.
So you say that std 4,6engine delivered more power and torgue at low rews than stage 3?

Have a look my stage3 4,6efi torque curve. (it´s not my best power/torque curve, but i cant find any better now.) My best torgue curve is 350Nm @ 1000-1100rpm and 440Nm@3800. Curve depends lot of ignition timing..
This graph shows about 325Nm@1000rpm.
1500rpm is about 375Nm.

Image
Image

Rpi says:
http://www.rpiv8.com/engine-3.htm

1500rpm = 340Nm.. Mine has got over 35Nm @ 1500rpm.
Timo
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”