Page 1 of 1

Crossover inlet manifold??

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:14 am
by kokkolanpoika
http://www.rover-v8.com/JEEngineering/w ... airbox.jpg

Nice looking inlet manifold tuning.. :D

I just wonder how good this would be? Are they worth of money? :shock:

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:36 am
by ChrisJC
As long as it is a crossover manifold (which I can't really see from the picture), then it ought to be better. Presumably they have some figures to back it up?

Chris.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:30 pm
by dnb
That reminds me of my manifold design.

Image

It gained me 53 bhp (around 20%) on my TVR.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:30 pm
by 350matt
Does that still bolt to the std inlet manifold ?

Matt

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 pm
by chodjinn
Hmm although I don't dispute that figure of 53bhp as it was dynoed (I believe), it still begs the question as to how the hell did that happen?!? Especially on a bloody TVR!! :?:

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:05 pm
by dnb
350matt wrote:Does that still bolt to the std inlet manifold ?
Yes, although I made sure mine was ported properly...

No comment on exactly where the 53 bhp came from, other than the original standard intake being dreadfully restrictive on an engine with 11:1 compression engine and a H404 cam!

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:02 am
by 5000SE
dnb wrote:
350matt wrote:Does that still bolt to the std inlet manifold ?
Yes, although I made sure mine was ported properly...

No comment on exactly where the 53 bhp came from, other than the original standard intake being dreadfully restrictive on an engine with 11:1 compression engine and a H404 cam!
Is the 53bhp quote an increase due purely to the intake swap, everything else being the same before and after???

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:24 am
by dnb
Everything else was identical as far as I know.

This is apart from the ECU requiring a lot of changes to the volumetric efficiency table to cope with the extra airflow capability.